Birmingham: The second city of culture or void of artistic importance?
16th Oct 2009
James Sant questions whether Birmingham is the Venice of England
IN Shane Meadow’s Midlands-set films one encounters a black and white, desaturated tableau. The characters are impoverished and so is the external landscape. Visitors to Birmingham, then, are probably unhinged when they encounter something different.
However, they presumably feel satisfied as their prejudices are confirmed on approaching New Street Station: the prison greys, crumbling concrete, and scurrying rats confirm a Meadow-esque city portraiture. Yet another face of the city awaits. The renovated Bullring Market is a composite of bright hues, glass facades, innovative architecture, suggesting the city has one foot in the future, not in the grave. The jury is out, though: its detractors call it an expensive face-lift that betrays its real ugliness. Vacuous beauty perhaps comes to mind.
If something more edifying is required there is the Museum and Art Galley which offers the largest collection of works by Edward Burne-Jones; meanwhile the Ikon Gallery boasts some of the most coruscating exhibitions outside London. If the Rep Theatre is too bland then numerous fringe theatres are dotted around, the venue above the Old Joint Stock Pub being popular. The refurbished Electric Cinema is a welcomed antidote to the multiplexes – and if the Birmingham accent is an affront to privileged ears the Symphony Hall may be an attractive remedy. Alternatively, the relocated O2 Academy on Bristol Street provides a platform for the contemporary sounds of the unheard.
Birmingham is not a polished gem – but at least it is brighter than the impoverished perceptions that are perpetually recycled.
Birmingham born and bred Noël Byrne argues for Mediocrity over Originality
I’M a Brummie, and growing up as a Brummie is hard. You’re stuck with an accent that no-one would ever want, whilst the city’s two main football teams excel in mediocrity and its two main cultural exports seem to be Duran Duran and Howard from the Halifax ads. I feel that this all stems from Birmingham itself and its multiple, misguided efforts to ‘reinvigorate the city’s culture’.
Some may praise the redevelopment from an industrial behemoth into a more commercial and user-friendly city as a key factor for its regeneration, but is knocking down grimy factories and replacing them with an Aldi here or a Topshop there a massive cultural step forward? Even the few classic buildings that are left intact, such as the Town Hall, are plastered with wide-screen TVs so the unwashed masses can watch snooker in public. Ever seen the Forward statue in Centenary Square? Current Birmingham students probably haven’t, since it was burned down by chavs a couple of years ago, whilst its replacement was the gaudy , ‘blinged-out’ gold Boulton-Watt-Murdock statue.
Music venues like the soulless new O2 Academy have money poured into them, while older venues with genuine history and character, like the Rainbow pub, are being threatened with closure by a Birmingham City Council which isn’t even trusted by government watchdogs to rebuild the city’s sad, grey public library. How can a city survive culturally when its originality is destroyed in favour of mediocrity?









Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment - Login/Register